The GW-Info list is a discussion list, which can be very active with many messages per day. Any subscriber of the GW-Info list has the ability to post on-topic messages.
From:
Chris BelleSubject:
Re: window-eyes ram usageDate:
Sun, May 23, 2010 6:16:57 amWell, for the price they charge and for the amount of resources they
can marshall, they better do something good down there in Florida 'grin'.
But if using a little extra memory will make we more stable, or help
it to not interfere with what I'm doing but just be my eyes for me,
then I don't mind.
That's what we have these new hot-shot processors for and lots of
memory, and I don't really notice jaws being more responsive than we now,
it wasn't that way with the whole 7 series, there was a noticeable
lag, but I think we're back to our snappiness and much better stability
with 7.2
It can still be improved on of course,
but random crashes happen much less often now.
They happen more in windows 7 than in xp.
Maybe we can get some comments from the giant brains as to what parts
of we are hogging the most memory and why.
All these programs are big pigs these days, oink, oink, grunt grunt,
seems like everything I use has to be installed with 4 dvds or
several cds, and has to access multiple libraries which need 27
plug-ins, which need 50 updates, which need 77 patches, and they all
need a restart after installing 'grin'.
As a friendly fellow commented to me off list privately, it's a
wonder any of this damned stuff works anyway.
At 12:26 AM 5/23/2010, Mohaned Sayegh wrote:
WARNING!!!
This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of
context, or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or an
overly politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive
language, or other indications of less than desirable behavior in a
public venue.
No ill will is intended.
The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or
otherwise extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposes implied
or imagined from said phrases.
The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solely
responsible for good
interpretation and intelligent deployment of subsequent responses to
the above communication.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to gw-info@gwmicro.com so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
can marshall, they better do something good down there in Florida 'grin'.
But if using a little extra memory will make we more stable, or help
it to not interfere with what I'm doing but just be my eyes for me,
then I don't mind.
That's what we have these new hot-shot processors for and lots of
memory, and I don't really notice jaws being more responsive than we now,
it wasn't that way with the whole 7 series, there was a noticeable
lag, but I think we're back to our snappiness and much better stability
with 7.2
It can still be improved on of course,
but random crashes happen much less often now.
They happen more in windows 7 than in xp.
Maybe we can get some comments from the giant brains as to what parts
of we are hogging the most memory and why.
All these programs are big pigs these days, oink, oink, grunt grunt,
seems like everything I use has to be installed with 4 dvds or
several cds, and has to access multiple libraries which need 27
plug-ins, which need 50 updates, which need 77 patches, and they all
need a restart after installing 'grin'.
As a friendly fellow commented to me off list privately, it's a
wonder any of this damned stuff works anyway.
At 12:26 AM 5/23/2010, Mohaned Sayegh wrote:
JAWS shows about 37 mb of memory on average.
Chris Belle wrote:
Just think of all a screen-reader has to do.
Most folks don't realize the low level programming that goes in toscreen-reader functionallity.
I'm not excusing piss poor programming, or laziness, but it's hard
to make a good screen-reader.
Think of all the automatic functions we does, things likehyperactive windows, reading tool-tips, the msaa stuff, the crazy
stuff that has to be done with video hacking even with mirrordrivers, everybody wants good sounding tts voices, so for quickest
access some of that is probably loaded in to memory.
And never mind the scripting stuff.
So it doesn't supprise me in this day of high level languages, andlet's just glue it all together and grab a module, that we is a bit
bloated like every other program on your system.
But it has to do a lot more than most programs on your system.
Watch your every keystroke, speak everything you mouse over orinteract with, and do it in some sort of logical and controled manner.
I guess that's worth a hundred megs of my ram 'grin'.
At 08:41 PM 5/22/2010, Mohaned Sayegh wrote:Hello, I'm just wondering, how come Window-eyes takes up anungodly amount of ram? When first loaded, with no scripts running,
it takes up 106 MB of ram on a windows 7 home premium 64 bit system right away.
thanksIf you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list andyour message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to gw-info@gwmicro.com so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo.You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
WARNING!!!
This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of
context, or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or anoverly politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive
language, or other indications of less than desirable behavior in apublic venue.
No ill will is intended.The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or
otherwise extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposesimplied or imagined from said phrases.
The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solelyresponsible for good
interpretation and intelligent deployment of subsequent responsesto the above communication.If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your
message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your
message to gw-info@gwmicro.com so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You
can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
WARNING!!!
This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of
context, or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or an
overly politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive
language, or other indications of less than desirable behavior in a
public venue.
No ill will is intended.
The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or
otherwise extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposes implied
or imagined from said phrases.
The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solely
responsible for good
interpretation and intelligent deployment of subsequent responses to
the above communication.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to gw-info@gwmicro.com so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
